"The so-called troika of tyranny in Latin America, the dictatorships of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, was always a misleading oversimplification. Despite sharing some common elements due to their authoritarian resilience, 21st-century dictatorships were never a homogeneous bloc."
"For over 60 years, Cuba has been a state dictatorship ruled by the army and a single party. Its inefficient, centralized state-run economy, exacerbated by the U.S. embargo, relies on massive external subsidies, first from the USSR and later from Chavista Venezuela."
"Venezuela, under the populist dictatorship of Hugo Chavez, became Cuba's main economic backer and only partially Nicaragua's until 2017. With Maduro as heir and coordinator of an authoritarian regime, the economic collapse and political repression continued."
Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, labeled the troika of tyranny, are not a homogeneous bloc despite shared authoritarian traits. Each country has distinct characteristics that necessitate tailored policies. Venezuela's recent political turmoil illustrates that military intervention does not guarantee a transition to democracy. Cuba's long-standing dictatorship has faced economic collapse and failed reforms, while Venezuela's regime continues to exert control despite external pressures. The situation in Nicaragua also reflects the complexities of authoritarian governance in the region, highlighting the need for nuanced approaches to U.S. foreign policy.
Read at english.elpais.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]