"The Gulf's central interest is neither to defend Iran nor to serve Israel's regional agenda. Its real interest is to prevent the region from becoming a battlefield. For Gulf states, escalation is a direct threat. Any confrontation involving Iran, Israel and the United States immediately affects Gulf airspace, shipping lanes, energy infrastructure, investment confidence and domestic stability. The Gulf cannot observe from a distance; it automatically incurs costs from the conflict."
"Therefore, the real choice is not between Iran or Israel. It is between stability or permanent war. Recent events have demonstrated that even if the Gulf does not initiate confrontation, it still becomes an arena of it. In June when Israel attacked Iran, the conflict spilled over. In September, an Israeli air strike targeted Doha. This was not a separate episode but a continuation of the same campaign."
"This matters because Qatar has built much of its foreign policy around mediation, dialogue, de-escalation and the preservation of channels with other regional actors. Yet even this posture did not shield it from the consequences of confrontation. The second conflict in 2026 widened the battlefield to the rest of the Gulf. This made it clear that the whole region is at risk when conflict erupts."
"Even before the latest escalation, the Gulf states already had experience with Iran-linked missile threats, proxy networks, ideological pressure, maritime insecurity and the use of instability as leverage. Iran's regional influence, combined with its ability to threaten the Strait of Hormuz, makes it a central concern for Gulf security."
The claim that Gulf security depends on choosing between Iran and Israel is strategically misleading. Gulf states prioritize preventing the region from becoming a battlefield rather than aligning against a rival. Escalation involving Iran, Israel, and the United States directly threatens Gulf airspace, shipping lanes, energy infrastructure, investment confidence, and domestic stability. Gulf states cannot remain distant from conflict and automatically incur costs. Recent events show spillover even without Gulf initiation, including attacks linked to Israel’s campaign and strikes affecting Gulf locations. Qatar’s mediation and de-escalation posture did not prevent consequences. A later widening of conflict across the Gulf demonstrates that the entire region is at risk when confrontation erupts.
#gulf-security #iran-israel-tensions #regional-escalation #strait-of-hormuz #de-escalation-and-mediation
Read at www.aljazeera.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]