#emtala

#emtala

The Supreme Court declined to hear a case on restoring abortion protections during emergencies in states with restrictive abortion laws.

Idaho can enforce its total abortion ban, even in cases where it's necessary to save a pregnant person's life.

The Supreme Court will hear the case against Idaho's abortion law in full in April.

The abortion debate is extending to the interpretation of a federal law called EMTALA, which stipulates emergency medical care but does not mention abortion specifically.

The outcome of the legal battles over EMTALA could have implications for the restrictiveness of state abortion laws and the ability of hospitals to provide other types of medical care.

The Supreme Court might prioritize a case on emergency abortions and EMTALA over one limiting mifepristone access, with significant implications for reproductive rights and the upcoming election.

The Supreme Court is hearing a challenge to Idaho's abortion ban in medical emergencies, part of ongoing fallout from reversing Roe v. Wade.

U.S. Supreme Court debates if EMTALA covers abortion during strict state bans.

The U.S. Supreme Court is to rule on whether Idaho's near-total abortion ban conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).