#first-amendment-rights

#first-amendment-rights

The Trump administration's approach to media has intensified, posing significant threats to journalistic integrity and First Amendment rights.

Trump wants to cut federal funding to Harvard for resisting administration demands.

Harvard stands firm against the Trump administration's controversial requirements.

Harvard University rejects demands to ensure Jewish students' safety, facing federal funding loss.

The institution claims First Amendment rights in its refusal to comply with administration orders.

Judicial intervention protects Mr. Khalil's rights, highlighting due process amid tensions over his pro-Palestinian activism.

Tens of thousands protested across the U.S. against President Trump's administration, highlighting concerns about government policies and social issues.

Court rulings consistently strike down laws censoring the internet, emphasizing the importance of focusing on advancing legislation that solves online privacy and competition issues without limiting users' free speech.

Bipartisan former FCC commissioners criticize current investigation into CBS for potentially infringing on First Amendment rights.

Concerns arise over the protection of First Amendment rights for pro-Palestine demonstrators amidst CPD actions during the Democratic National Convention.

Maria Ristow and Vice Mayor Rob Moore deny defamation allegations by activist Lynley Kerr Hogan, seeking dismissal and costs in response to her lawsuit.

Eight TikTok content creators sued the U.S. government over the TikTok ban, citing First Amendment rights.

A potential TikTok ban due to national security concerns may disrupt content creators' livelihoods and infringe on their First Amendment rights.

Thousands arrested in pro-Palestinian protests at academic institutions. Charges dropped, showing First Amendment rights importance.

NetChoice, representing major companies, sues Georgia to halt law on high-volume sellers' data collection on online classified sites, citing federal law clash and constitutional issues.

NetChoice is suing Georgia over a law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline.

Internet trade group sues Georgia over law requiring data on high-volume sellers who collect offline payments.

NetChoice filed a lawsuit against Georgia's law requiring online classified sites to gather data on high-volume sellers who collect payment offline, citing violations of federal law and First Amendment rights.

NetChoice, representing tech companies, is suing Georgia over a law requiring data collection from online sellers using offline payment methods.

The lawsuit argues the Georgia law violates First Amendment rights and is unconstitutionally vague, seeking a temporary and permanent block from enforcement.