Mr. Manz's evidence is entirely lacking in regard. The only evidence he puts forward is his personal testimony. He also provides no evidence whatsoever of what the reasonable standard of care for spicy food might be. Without any admissible testimony as to reasonable care or spice level, no jury could conclude that Los Tacos had a duty to warn Mr. Manz.
Because if you look at this ruling, I will tell you, as a Justice Department alum, Kaitlan, it's painful. The way this broke. I was 10 minutes into teaching a class of college students, in a class about DOJ and the need to be independent of politics. And so, we stopped. We did breaking news is what happens if you take my class. Put it up on the screen, and started sort of reading the highlights.