"The misuse of AI is transforming considered op-eds such as this into slop-inion that is infecting the editorial pages of reputable media outlets. In recent weeks Crikey has had to remove a series on leadership, while the features editor at Capital Brief took to LinkedIn bemoaning the fact that 80-90% of all submissions appear to be AI-generated."
"Recognising that I need to know thy enemy, I've spent the last month trying Anthropic's Claude to understand how it might support my writing process. To guide me on this journey, I've been taking advice from former Australian chief scientist Alan Finkel who has launched a global certification process for creators to verify their work is human-authored."
"Proudly Human applies de minimis to verify human authorship, a legal principle that has been used to establish inputs that would not undermine a creator's right to copyright their work. The principle sets the bounds for what can be used to assist a creator's work without it ceasing to be theirs."
The rise of AI-generated content is compromising the quality of editorial writing, with many submissions being AI-produced. Ethical dilemmas arise regarding authorship and originality, especially when AI assists in research or content creation. Acknowledging these challenges, a global certification process has been initiated to verify human authorship. This initiative aims to maintain the integrity of creative work while allowing for the use of AI tools in the writing process, ensuring that the final output remains distinctly human.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]