"It is wrong to present the OAI contract as if it is the same deal than Anthropic rejected, or even as if it is less protective of the red lines than the deal Anthropic already had in place before. Obviously I don't know all details of what Anthropic had before, but based on what I know, it is quite likely that the contract OAI signed gives more guarantees of no usage of models for mass domestic surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons than Anthropic ever had."
"Last week, Sam Altman confirmed OpenAI's deal to give the Department of Defense access to its AI models. The agreement came after Anthropic refused to accept government terms that could have allowed its model, Claude, to be deployed for mass domestic surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons."
OpenAI reached an agreement with the US Department of Defense to provide access to its AI models, contrasting with Anthropic's refusal to accept government terms that could enable mass domestic surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons. OpenAI claims its Defense Department contract includes stronger safety guardrails than Anthropic's rejected offer. Following public concerns about the deal, Sam Altman announced OpenAI is working with the Pentagon to add further protections. OpenAI staff member Boaz Barak defended the agreement, arguing the contract provides more safeguards against mass surveillance and autonomous weapons than Anthropic previously had, countering narratives that OpenAI compromised its safety principles.
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]