The Open Source Initiative has defined "open" AI to require transparency about training data, complete coding, and accessible model settings—challenging models like Meta’s Llama.
Meta’s Llama, despite being marketed as open-source, fails OSI's criteria due to restrictions on commercial use and lack of access to training data, igniting conflict.
Meta spokesperson Faith Eischen emphasized a need for ongoing dialogue with OSI, arguing that a standard definition for open AI is complex due to rapid advancements.
With AI evolving, tech giants must choose between maintaining OSI’s long-standing open-source principles or deviating, which could redefine collaboration in AI development.
Collection
[
|
...
]