"To gauge whether artificial intelligence could complete a project as effectively as a human being, a group of researchers gave several AIs a series of work projects to perform. Already accomplished by real remote freelance workers, the projects covered game development, product design, architecture, data analysis, and video animation. More specifically, the tasks included such challenges as the following: Build an interactive dashboard for exploring data from the World Happiness Report. Create 3D animations to showcase the features of a new earbuds design and case."
"Create a 2D animated video advertising the offerings of a free services company. Develop architectural plans and a 3D model for a container home based on an existing PDF design. Build a brewing-themed version of the "Watermelon Game," where players merge falling objects to reach the highest level item. Format a paper using the provided features and equations for an IEEE conference."
Several AIs were assigned a series of remote work projects that had been completed by real freelance workers, covering game development, product design, architecture, data analysis, and video animation. Tasks included building an interactive World Happiness Report dashboard, creating 3D and 2D animations, developing architectural plans and a 3D container-home model, adapting a merging-style game, and formatting an IEEE paper. The human-executed tasks cost about $10,000 and required more than 100 hours. A benchmark called the Remote Labor Index (RLI) was created to compare AI and human performance. The AIs performed poorly relative to human freelancers, although AI capabilities continue to improve.
Read at ZDNET
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]