SCHD's Dividend Growth vs. JEPI's 8.16% Yield - Which Strategy Wins for Retirees?
Briefly

SCHD's Dividend Growth vs. JEPI's 8.16% Yield - Which Strategy Wins for Retirees?
"The most obvious advantage of the JEPI ETF is the exceptionally high dividend yield of 8.16%. You also get upside potential alongside that fat dividend yield, which very few other ETFs give outside of covered call ones. As a result, if you invest $200,000 from your portfolio into JEPI, you're going to get $16,320 per year."
"JEPI derives this yield by first holding a portfolio of defensive, lower-volatility stocks that its managers believe will hold up better than the broader market. It then sells out-of-the-money call options on the S&P 500 Index instead of the individual stocks it owns. To do this, it uses Equity Linked Notes (ELNs) that mimic the returns of selling these call options."
"The disadvantage is that you get capped upside, but it does not cap the downside risk as much. The result is that JEPI does very well when Wall Street has its rose-tinted glasses on. You get both yield and upside, and the ETF looks hard to top. But if and when the stock market starts seriously declining, it may take you significantly longer to recover due to the capped upside."
JEPI delivers a very high 8.16% dividend yield with monthly distributions by holding defensive, lower-volatility stocks and using Equity Linked Notes that mimic selling out-of-the-money S&P 500 call options. That approach produces substantial immediate income—for example, a $200,000 investment would generate $16,320 annually—but it limits upside while leaving downside risk less mitigated. JEPI typically performs well in strong markets when option income complements stock gains, yet recovery after steep declines may take significantly longer because upside is capped. SCHD pursues a longer-term dividend snowball strategy focused on compounding rather than maximizing current yield. Both strategies carry risks that should be quantified before choosing one.
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]