"Gitane De Silva, former senior representative for Alberta to the United States, explained that energy proportionality meant Canada had to maintain its energy exports to the U.S. regardless of domestic needs, stating, 'What we'd send to them on a good day, we'd also have to send to them on a bad day.' This clause effectively limited Canada's ability to redirect energy exports or prioritize domestic supply."
"Carlo Dade, director of international policy at the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy, noted that the previous energy restrictions were influenced by historical events, saying, 'Back under the original agreement, the spectre of the Arab oil embargo loomed large in the U.S.,' highlighting the context of oil supply concerns that shaped earlier trade agreements."
The removal of the energy proportionality clause in CUSMA signifies a major change in Canada-U.S. energy trade dynamics. Previously, this clause mandated Canada to maintain consistent energy exports to the U.S., even during emergencies. Historical concerns, particularly from the 1970s oil crises, influenced earlier agreements. With advancements in U.S. energy production technologies, Canada now faces new challenges and opportunities in its energy export strategies without the constraints of the past agreements.
Read at www.cbc.ca
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]