"The post sought a remote full-time creative strategist to join a Charlotte-based baby product retailer. The role sits at the content, branding, and social media crossroads, word to Bone Thugs-N-Harmony. "You need to be sharp, fast, and actually understand what makes people stop scrolling and buy," the since-deleted post read. "This is... not a sit-back-and-brainstorm role.""
"At face value, it read like a dope opportunity for someone willing to roll up their sleeves and market the hell out of some burping cushions. That is, until you consider the proposed salary: $55,000. Yes, 55,000 American dollars. For a mid-to-senior level marketing gig. Yikes. Talk about a recession indicator."
"Threads tore it to shreds. And I understood the outrage. Some called the poster-who happened to be a Black woman-exploitative. Others said the salary was fair for some regions."
"I hated to see a Black woman dogpiled while major corporations are out here lowballing employees worse than Facebook Marketplace negotiations."
A job posting for a remote creative strategist at a baby product retailer in Charlotte drew significant backlash due to its low salary of $55,000 for a mid-to-senior level position. The post emphasized the need for a proactive candidate who could effectively engage consumers. Reactions on Threads ranged from outrage over perceived exploitation to suggestions for restructuring the role. The incident highlighted broader issues of fair compensation and the challenges faced by individuals in the marketing industry, particularly when it comes to salary expectations.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]