The article expresses deep frustration with a pervasive yet unrequested phenomenon. It highlights the dehumanizing and environmental costs associated with it. The author's disappointment grows as they observe how the best minds are focused on compelling societal adaptation and acceptance, driven largely by shareholder demands. Numerous conversations revolve around it, reflecting the societal obsession despite mixed feelings about its necessity and impact. The narrative signals a struggle between ethical considerations and financial motivations, leaving the impression that many feel 'dirty' engaging with it.
The pervasive, all encompassing nature of it.
I feel dirty using it.
A thousand no's, but 'yes' when shareholders start clamouring for it.
I’m bored of it.
Collection
[
|
...
]