'Refs don't generally favor Barca' - Laporta hits back at Perez
Briefly

'Refs don't generally favor Barca' - Laporta hits back at Perez
"It seems they have to talk about Barça to justify who knows what. They're constantly involved in the legal proceedings of the 'Negreira Case,' which they're dragging out like chewing gum because they know there's nothing to it, but it's a way of justifying something that isn't true: Barça has never bribed referees, and referees generally don't favor Barça; they've always favored Madrid."
"Just last week, Real Madrid scored two goals that, in my opinion, clearly involved Bellingham handling the ball, and in the other, Vinicius broke Iñaki's nose. Those two goals shouldn't have stood, and Barça would be leading the league now. They have a persecution complex against the best period in Barça's history. They didn't like that Barça was the world's leading team from 2004 to 2015, when Barça was dominant, and they're trying to find excuses that lead nowhere."
Joan Laporta described Real Madrid as obsessed with Barcelona and accused the club of perpetuating the Negreira case to justify false claims. He stated that Barcelona never bribed referees and argued that referees historically favored Real Madrid. Laporta cited two recent Real Madrid goals he believes were illegitimate — one involving a Jude Bellingham handball and another where Vinicius collided with Iñaki, allegedly breaking his nose — and said those goals should not have stood, which would have left Barcelona leading the league. He accused Madrid of a persecution complex and of seeking excuses for Barcelona's successful history and style of play.
Read at Barca Blaugranes
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]