'2073' is a film some people really don't want you to see. You should watch it
Briefly

The film 2073 presents a dystopian glimpse of America in the year 2073, blending genres into a unique hybrid work that serves both as a warning and social commentary. Directed by Asif Kapadia, it has drawn criticism, reflected in a 48% Rotten Tomatoes rating, thought to be due to review-bombing by those implicated in its critique of societal decline. The portrayal focuses on a protagonist's scavenging journey through abandoned spaces, a metaphor for current issues fueled by political actions. Though characterized as neither documentary nor fiction, it emphasizes the dire predictions for our future if contemporary trends persist.
The film portrays a dystopian vision of life in America in 2073, emphasizing widespread decay and societal collapse due to current trends.
2073 is not a fiction or documentary; it serves as a warning about the future if current societal trends continue unchecked.
Its low Rotten Tomatoes score is speculated to result from review-bombing by those criticized in the film for their roles in societal decline.
Directed by Asif Kapadia, the film presents a prophetic narrative reflecting the United States' trajectory before significant political shifts.”}],
The film is a unique hybrid of multiple genres, primarily resembling a documentary that sheds light on present-day issues through the lens of a dystopian future.
Characters and plot development take a backseat to the film's central thesis, firmly rooting its message in reality rather than a fictional narrative.
The film's protagonist scavenges in a desolate landscape, reminiscent of today's societal issues, reflecting the consequences of political and social decisions made in the present.
2073 hauntingly combines glimpses of current events within a sparse sci-fi framework, making it a chilling reflection on the direction of the world.
Read at Daily Kos
[
|
]