The Office of Cybersecurity issued a warning about WhatsApp, labeling it high-risk due to concerns over its data protection practices, including a lack of encryption for stored data. Despite these claims, WhatsApp's security measures weren't found culpable for any incidents, although there are suggestions its encryption might expose some data. Disagreement with this stance has been expressed by Meta, emphasizing WhatsApp's robust security compared to other approved applications, highlighting its regular use by members of the House of Representatives.
The Office of Cybersecurity has deemed WhatsApp a high-risk to users due to the lack of transparency in how it protects user data and absence of stored data encryption.
WhatsApp's security measures were not at fault in either case, though there has been some suggestion that certain vulnerabilities within WhatsApp's encryption processes could expose lesser data points.
We disagree with the House Chief Administrative Officer's characterization in the strongest possible terms. We know members and their staffs regularly use WhatsApp.
Meta further notes that WhatsApp offers a higher level of security than most of the apps on the CAO's approved list, and should not be subject to these warnings.
Collection
[
|
...
]