Lawmakers Question Publish-or-Perish Culture of Research

""The result is a publish-or-perish culture that rewards quantity over quality and creates a ready market for shortcuts when speed and quantity displace rigor or reproducibility," said Representative Rich McCormick. "What was once a straightforward process of peer review and dissemination has become a complex, commercialized marketplace with maligned incentives and bad actors willing to exploit them.""

"Although scientific publishing companies turn big profits by selling journal subscriptions, authors and peer reviewers are rarely paid for their work. Instead they are rewarded with tenure, promotion and career cachet. And those incentives have led to the proliferation of paper mills that are infusing the literature with faulty science—a problem that generative artificial intelligence is only exacerbating."

Federal lawmakers are seeking solutions to enhance the integrity of scientific research amid rising concerns about research fraud. A hearing by the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology focused on issues like paper mills, reproducibility, and open-access policies. Lawmakers acknowledged the problematic incentive structures within the $11 billion scientific publishing industry, which prioritize quantity over quality. This has led to an increase in paper mills and retractions, with generative artificial intelligence further complicating the landscape.

Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs