The Supreme Court faces a critical decision on ISP liability for copyright infringement following a significant ruling against Cox Communications for enabling user piracy. This case stems from a $1 billion jury verdict related to peer-to-peer file sharing on Cox's network during 2013-2014. Cox's imposed 'thirteen-strike' policy for repeat infringers was deemed ineffectively lax, as the ISP prioritized subscriber retention over vigorous copyright enforcement. The Solicitor General has advised the Court to narrow the contributory infringement standard to establish clearer guidelines for ISPs, potentially impacting how future cases are managed and interpreted.
The Supreme Court is reviewing how ISPs can be held responsible for user copyright infringement, particularly regarding contributory and vicarious liability standards.
Cox's lax enforcement of its copyright policy arguably resulted in forfeiting DMCA protections, highlighting the tension between revenue interests and copyright responsibility.
Collection
[
|
...
]