#supreme-court

#supreme-court

McDonald's is ending some diversity practices in response to a Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action, reflecting a broader corporate trend.

The Supreme Court exempted military academies from its ruling on affirmative action, impacting their admissions practices significantly.

Despite the Supreme Court's ban on affirmative action, racial and ethnic diversity in law school enrollment remained stable in 2024, with some exceptions.

A federal judge faced consequences for critiquing a Supreme Court Justice's improper conduct, indicating a troubling trend in judicial accountability.

Judicial gifts pose a significant threat to judicial independence and should be regulated to avoid undue influence.

The Supreme Court's decisions have raised significant concerns about the balance between judicial authority and expert knowledge, particularly regarding public policy and homelessness.

The Supreme Court's decision has led to over 40 Californian cities, including Fresno, enacting strict anti-camping laws.

Biden highlights the confirmation of 235 judges as a key achievement, emphasizing the importance of legal precedent and democracy restoration.

Biden's judicial appointments reflect a significant increase in diversity among federal judges, impacting public perception and access to justice.

Public trust in the US Supreme Court has collapsed, reflecting a crisis in confidence akin to that seen in authoritarian regimes.

Banning TikTok risks violating free speech principles in the U.S., aligning it with authoritarian regimes that restrict social media.

The Supreme Court's intervention is critical for the Corporate Transparency Act amid an ongoing legal battle.

Jamie Raskin aims to mobilize Democratic efforts against the Supreme Court through his leadership on judiciary matters.

Texas' challenge in the Supreme Court could redefine First Amendment protections for sexual speech.

Judges play a vital role in upholding the rule of law during political turbulence.

Aerial surveillance poses a significant threat to privacy, necessitating updated legal frameworks to protect individual rights.

The Supreme Court's recent decisions are limiting federal agencies' power to regulate pollution and address climate change.

There are serious concerns about the potential undermining of birthright citizenship under a second Trump administration, particularly through regulatory changes.

Federal courts are increasingly ruling against state gun restrictions following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, leading to significant challenges for gun regulations.

The second Trump administration may leverage a broadly defined presidential power from recent Supreme Court rulings, impacting legal advice and initiatives.

Legal challenges could arise in diverse initiatives from the second Trump administration, with significant implications for executive power.

The Supreme Court is deliberating major IP cases that could significantly affect corporate liability regarding trademarks and copyright infringement.

Significant changes in IP law will impact legal practice for years to come, especially regarding trademark and First Amendment intersections.

Trump aims to dismantle DEI policies and reshape America’s approach to race and governance during his second term.

Aileen Cannon's dismissal of Trump's classified documents case raises speculation about her future in politics and potential Supreme Court ambitions.

The Supreme Court is reviewing South Carolina's decision to terminate Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood based on its provision of abortion services.

The Supreme Court case Kerr v. Planned Parenthood could significantly restrict Medicaid funding for essential women's healthcare services, affecting millions.

Supreme Court to review South Carolina's Medicaid funding decision impacting Planned Parenthood amidst ongoing abortion debates.

Chase Strangio exemplifies relentless advocacy for transgender rights, recently arguing before the Supreme Court against discriminatory healthcare laws for minors.

The U.S. Supreme Court case U.S. v. Skrmetti challenges Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for minors, spotlighting rigid gender norms.

Justice Scalia epitomized an unethical relationship with wealthy benefactors, regularly accepting luxury gifts and failing to disclose them, violating federal ethical standards.

Democrats report alleged ethical violations by Supreme Court justices, especially focusing on Justice Clarence Thomas and his acceptance of extravagant gifts.

The investigation reports luxury travel by Justice Clarence Thomas and calls for an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court.

The investigation highlights ethical concerns regarding Justice Clarence Thomas's undisclosed luxury trips and calls for enforced ethical standards in the Supreme Court.

Justice Thomas failed to disclose trips funded by billionaire Harlan Crow, raising ethical concerns about transparency in the Supreme Court.