The article critiques Elon Musk's disregard for legal norms, particularly following his controversial comments about the judiciary via his social media platform, X. Musk's statements imply a skewed understanding of democracy and law, especially as he translates his personal interests into broader ideological battles. Legal experts like Paul Grimm emphasize the role of judges in maintaining constitutional checks and balances. The piece also highlights Musk's tendency to challenge various legal institutions and raise concerns about the influence of law firms in political matters, warning of a potential erosion of democratic values.
It should be abundantly clear by now, but it bears repeating: Elon Musk has no respect for the rule of law. His position on everything depends solely on his calculation of how much he personally benefits.
Musk used X to stir up the far-right base, saying, "Democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup." Which, obviously, is not at all what's happening.
Paul Grimm, director of the Bolch Judicial Institute at Duke Law School, notes, "The Constitution imposes on judges the duty to exercise checks and balances on legislative and executive action that has been challenged as violating the law."
It crosses the line to attempt to threaten and intimidate a judge in doing so, and such conduct is indefensible.
Collection
[
|
...
]