At a Harvard Law School panel, former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer and other legal experts discussed the complexities of legal interpretation. Breyer emphasized the necessity of historical context and case law beyond mere textual analysis. The panel also showcased Judge Kevin Newsom's innovative approach of using generative language models to aid in deciphering contract terms. This event highlighted the importance of understanding the various methods and tools available for effective legal interpretation, reinforcing the notion that lawyering is a multifaceted discipline relying on more than just direct statutory readings.
Former Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer spoke on the practical challenges of legal interpretation with several legal experts at a Harvard Law School panel hosted by the Harvard Law Review.
Judges are rarely thought of as hands-on investigative and experimental types, but his relatively recent foray into using generative language models to suss out the ordinary meaning of contract terms was super interesting.
Breyer discussed the importance of understanding the historical context and case law in the interpretation of law, illustrating how legal reading goes beyond just text.
The panel aimed to deepen the discussion on legal interpretation methods, emphasizing the critical role that context plays in understanding legal texts.
Collection
[
|
...
]