Moore Tells Appellate Court that Newman's Challenge to Suspension is Doomed

The Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit asserted that Judge Pauline Newman has been granted more procedural fairness than the Fifth Amendment mandates, reflecting on the thoroughness of the judicial process during this appeal.

Judge Newman's appeal, according to the CAFC's brief, should be dismissed as it fails to articulate the 'exceptional circumstances' that would justify a transfer to another circuit, underscoring the adequacy of the current proceedings.

The NCLA argued that Judge Moore's actions constituted an 'unconstitutional campaign' against Judge Newman, presenting a serious claim about the fairness and integrity of judicial proceedings concerning a sitting Article III judge.

CAFC emphasized that the temporary suspension imposed on Judge Newman does not equate to her removal from the bench, as the suspension is a procedural measure that remains within the confines of judicial conduct.

Read at IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law