WilmerHale is making headlines by actively contesting an unlawful order imposed by the administration, emphasizing their commitment to uphold legal integrity. This situation has raised eyebrows within the legal community, with notable firms like Skadden and Paul Weiss expressing support. Despite a generally quiet response from other biglaw firms regarding retaliatory measures faced by peers, speculation suggests a possible amicus brief might be in the works. Meanwhile, the ABA's axing from disaster relief services reveals the significant consequences of FEMA's regulatory actions, while Republicans seek to eliminate overdraft fee restrictions, highlighting ongoing tensions in consumer financial protections.
WilmerHale is actively challenging what it considers an unlawful order by the administration, standing in solidarity with other law firms as the legal landscape shifts.
While reactions from large firms to the retaliation against peer firms are muted, speculations about an upcoming amicus brief indicate a potential collective movement.
The ABA's withdrawal from disaster relief services highlights the impact of governmental actions, especially following the recent freeze on services from FEMA.
The push by Republicans to eliminate restrictions on overdraft fees demonstrates a continuing battle over consumer financial protections, with potential implications for banking regulations.
Collection
[
|
...
]