The article critiques the current administration's lack of interest in enforcing securities laws, particularly targeting ESG initiatives. It highlights the potential motivations behind cutting the SEC's access to Westlaw, suggesting it may involve more than just budgetary concerns. The author argues that the administration is actively purging media access that contradicts its narrative, drawing attention to how this impacts reputable journalism's role in holding power accountable. The discussion reflects growing concerns over media freedom and censorship under a politically charged atmosphere.
The new administration's apparent disinterest in enforcing securities laws seems tied to political agendas, specifically targeting ESG initiatives and undercutting regulatory bodies.
The decision to cut off the SEC's Westlaw access may not just reflect budget cuts, but a broader attempt to manage the narrative around the administration.
The administration's push to purge access to certain media seems aimed at those that directly challenge Trump's narrative, highlighting an alarming disregard for objective journalism.
In an environment where major outlets like The New York Times and Reuters are labeled leftist, we witness an alarming trend of rolling back media freedom.
Collection
[
|
...
]