Letters: Americans don't have a vested right to Social Security
Briefly

The article presents a compilation of letters to the editor expressing diverse concerns, including misconceptions about Social Security where a Supreme Court ruling clarifies there's no legal entitlement. Mark Carbonaro argues for the establishment of a legal right to these benefits. Valerie Carter addresses the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, calling for more awareness to support aid efforts. Robert critiques Trump's administration for undermining constitutional values, particularly in how his actions relate to due process and judicial independence, suggesting a dangerous trend in undermining American principles.
In 1960, the Supreme Court ruled in Flemming v. Nestor that there are no property rights to Social Security, emphasizing government's flexibility in administering benefits.
Valerie Carter highlights the dire humanitarian conditions in Gaza, urging increased awareness to pressure the U.S. government to facilitate aid and access to necessary supplies.
In his remarks, Robert argues that Trump’s attacks on institutions like the judiciary undermine the fundamental principles of due process enshrined in the Constitution.
Mark Carbonaro suggests Congress needs to legislate a legal property right to Social Security, as current laws only impose a moral obligation for payments.
Read at www.mercurynews.com
[
|
]