The 'Can't Lose Parlay' Controversy: When Ads Cross The Line
Briefly

In a notable case, Penn Sports Interactive faced a $25,000 fine from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission over their 'Can't Lose Parlay' campaign linked to Dan Katz. The name, intended humorously in Katz's podcast, misled some consumers into believing in guaranteed winning bets. The commission stressed regulatory adherence, highlighting the need for clear communication in gambling promotions, showcasing the delicate interplay between creativity and compliance that operators must navigate to avoid legal pitfalls.
The Massachusetts Gaming Commission fined Penn Sports Interactive $25,000 for advertising non-compliance related to Dan Katz's 'Can't Lose Parlay' promotion.
The regulator found the terminology misleading, as consumers might misinterpret humor for a guaranteed win, violating gambling advertising guidelines.
Read at Cardplayer
[
|
]