Marty Baron, former top editor of the Post, expressed that the non-endorsement presents ‘cowardice, with democracy as its casualty,’ highlighting the impact of such decisions on political discourse.
The rationale behind the non-endorsements is perceived as clumsy by many observers, suggesting that avoiding controversy with Trump and readers played a significant role in the decision-making process.
Despite the historic importance of endorsements, it remains uncertain how much influence they actually wield in modern elections, especially in the current polarized political climate of the U.S.
With both The Washington Post and LA Times refusing to endorse candidates, their decisions come from a place of fear rather than a clear political stance, making the issue controversial.
Collection
[
|
...
]