A federal judge in South Florida vacated Dr. Mark Agresti's eight-year prison sentence after establishing that a primary witness, Kenneth Bailynson, had lied during his testimony. Bailynson had previously claimed to have made illegal cash payments to Agresti, which led to his conviction on healthcare fraud and conspiracy charges. The judge ordered a new trial, recognizing that Bailynson's fabricated narrative was essential to Agresti's conviction, thus prompting a reevaluation of whether federal prosecutors would retry the case against him.
"Throughout his testimony ... Bailynson weaved lies with truths, crafting a narrative that pitted his word against Agresti's. Bailynson's fable was crucial to [Agresti's] conviction."
"But while Bailynson's conviction-making testimony undoubtedly contained some truths, the prosecutors ensured a guilty verdict by utilizing his narrative against Dr. Agresti without sufficient validation."
Collection
[
|
...
]