The article discusses the controversial case of Alon and Oren Alexander, who face charges of sexual battery. Their defense claims that the prominent law firm Morgan & Morgan exerted undue influence on state prosecutors to bring forward these charges, all while preparing a civil lawsuit against the brothers for an alleged rape. The defense team argues that this intertwining of civil litigation and criminal prosecution undermines the integrity of the legal process, and is demanding evidence gathered by the law firm be disclosed for their defense strategy.
Morgan & Morgan's actions suggest an intertwining of civil suits and criminal prosecutions, raising serious concerns about the integrity of legal processes and attorney-client privilege.
The defense argues that state prosecutors relied significantly on the evidentiary findings from Morgan & Morgan, calling into question the independence of their criminal case.
Alon and Oren Alexander contend that the evidence obtained by Morgan & Morgan to bolster their civil case improperly influenced the criminal charges against them.
This case exemplifies the potential conflicts that can arise when personal injury law firms engage in criminal cases, complicating the lines of legal ethics.
Collection
[
|
...
]