The article examines the debate between drafting by Best Player Available (BPA) versus filling team needs in the NFL. By comparing BPA selections with traditional mock drafts, the piece highlights the absurdity of solely relying on BPA—as seen through mismatches in player rankings versus team necessities. It underscores that while NFL executives, including Dolphins GM Chris Grier, advocate for BPA strategies, the practical approach may involve prioritizing needs to build a solid foundation for the team at a low cost instead of opting for expensive free agency fixes.
It's time to question the validity of drafting by BPA versus need, as traditional drafts often emphasize filling specific team holes.
NFL executives claim to draft by best player available (BPA), but this practice can overlook essential team needs and create unnecessary gaps.
This analysis compares BPA selections against traditional mock drafts, revealing a potential mismatch between top player rankings and team requirements.
Drafting by need is a more prudent strategy for building a competitive NFL roster while managing costs effectively than solely relying on BPA.
Collection
[
|
...
]