The tribes' suit alleges that the gambling halls scattered across California are illegally offering card games such as blackjack and pai gow poker that cut into the tribes' gambling revenues. This lawsuit opens a new front in the ongoing political battle over gambling in the state, particularly given its potential implications for tax revenues that support local city services.
In their lawsuit, the tribes assert that the defendants are profiting from illegal gambling practices, a serious charge that highlights the contentious nature of the relationship between tribal and non-tribal gaming interests in California.
This lawsuit could have sweeping implications for California's cardroom industry, as local governments rely heavily on taxes from these businesses to fund essential services such as police and road repairs, putting those budgets at risk.
The tribes argue that California voters granted them exclusive rights to host certain table games years ago, indicating a deep-rooted conflict over gaming rights that could shape the future of gambling regulation in the state.
Collection
[
|
...
]