In this case, Próvaí emphasized that the legal battle was "never about money" but was rather about defending artistic expression and opposing governmental censorship. He claimed that the ruling highlighted a broader "attack on artistic culture" and the principles of the Good Friday Agreement, framing it as a pivotal moment for freedom of expression in the context of political dissent.
After winning the case, the band members expressed that financial compensation was secondary to the essential point of contesting the government's restrictive decision. Próvaí noted that this ruling confirmed that the UK government's actions were not just unlawful, but that they reflect a systemic bias against expressions of Irish political identity.
Collection
[
|
...
]