Combs' lawyers argue that detailed explanations provided for denying bail in cases like Epstein and Maxwell contrast with the lack of justification in Combs' case, indicating a legal error regarding his detention order.
The appeal emphasizes that while judges gave thorough justifications in previous high-profile cases, Combs' detention lacks such detailed factual findings, which federal law mandates under section 3142(g).
By offering to comply with strict conditions for release, including drug testing and visitor limitations, Combs' legal team underscores his commitment to adhering to regulations while awaiting trial.
The lawyers assert that Combs' charges should not necessitate such confinement, particularly arguing that the conduct was consensual and challenging the credibility of the prosecution's main witness.
Collection
[
|
...
]