Catherine, a 76-year-old part-time consultant, noted that Walz, while rushed, displayed more substance and sincerity compared to the slick and polished Vance, who lacked depth.
Catherine expressed her desire for more substantial answers from Vance regarding tax breaks for the rich, emphasizing concern for middle-class families and those on fixed incomes.
She praised Walz's passionate closing remarks, which directly engaged the audience, reflecting sincerity that resonated with her, contrasting sharply with Vance's approach.
Catherine criticized Vance for being a 'slick talker' who chameleon-like managed to present Trumpism as palatable, while she found Walz more grounded and substantive.
Collection
[
|
...
]