The article compares two pieces of code for implementing a modal, emphasizing the advantages of Code 1 over Code 2. Code 1 utilizes a smooth translation and opacity transition for better visual appeal, allowing for intuitive user interaction. Its handling of pointer-events ensures that the modal is only interactive when active. In contrast, Code 2's use of transform: scale and inconsistent pointer-events could lead to performance issues and a less favorable user experience across various devices and browsers. Therefore, Code 1 is recommended for its effective animation and user engagement.
Code 1 enhances user experience with a smooth translation effect using transform: translateY(-25%);, while maintaining interactivity through precise pointer-events control.
Conversely, Code 2's combination of translate(0, -25%) and transform: scale(1); may cause inconsistent animations, risking diminished effectiveness across platforms.
Collection
[
|
...
]