The article critiques the New York Times for its outdated style and alleged bias, particularly in handling the discourse around children's entertainer Ms. Rachel, who advocates for Palestinian children. Despite her efforts to highlight the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, including sharing poignant stories and images, her position has sparked backlash. The critique suggests that the newspaper's coverage reflects a dismissive tone towards genuine humanitarian concerns and advocates, exploring how advocacy for Palestinian children is misinterpreted as controversial or conspiratorial.
Griffin-Accurso's grave sin is that she wants Israel to stop starving and killing Palestinian children in Gaza.
It's sad that people try to make it controversial when you speak out for children that are facing immeasurable suffering.
That acronym for a child who has no surviving relatives. I think it should be controversial to not say anything.
The largest cohort of child amputees in modern history.
Collection
[
|
...
]