Cory Booker's sad stunt epitomizes Democrats' empty agenda
Briefly

Sen. Cory Booker's extended filibuster serves as a symbolic gesture showcasing the Democratic Party's current disarray following their electoral defeats. Rather than advancing a meaningful agenda or opposing specific policies, his lengthy speech appeared aimed primarily at attracting attention from the party's left-wing base, which is frustrated with leadership decisions. Meanwhile, other Democrats, like city Comptroller Brad Lander, focus on legal actions against corporations, hoping to revive political fortunes despite such moves typically yielding poor results. Overall, these actions reflect a party struggling to reclaim or redefine its narrative in a challenging political landscape.
Sen. Cory Booker's pointless imitation filibuster embodies Democrats' incoherence post-defeat, serving only as a hollow performance without real impact or strategy.
This symbolic performance more resembles introspective politics, demonstrating where Democrats currently stand: amid self-indulgence without tangible goals or opportunities.
Brad Lander's lawsuit against Tesla for securities fraud appears aimed at improving his mayoral campaign, but suing CEOs over stock drops traditionally proves unfruitful.
Even as Booker rambled on, the Democratic strategy remains ineffective—it does not challenge the Senate GOP majority or attract swing voters.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]