The recent approval from San Francisco's Planning Commission allows homeowners affected by unsafe construction work to evade fees, a move aimed at aiding victims of a bribery scandal involving building inspectors. However, the city's approach raises concerns due to its restrictive eligibility criteria and failure to fully acknowledge the extent of corruption within the Department of Building Inspection. Critics argue that this method is akin to turning off the tickertape machine, creating a temporary illusion of peace while neglecting fundamental issues in the system, such as transparency and systemic accountability.
The Planning Commission's recent decision to waive fees for homeowners impacted by faulty work represents a misguided approach, protecting them but overlooking broader systemic issues.
By limiting eligibility for amnesty and lacking transparency on departmental failures, the city mirrors an ineffective method of 'turning off the tickertape machine' and ignoring underlying problems.
Collection
[
|
...
]