Sal Naseem stated, 'I was not convinced that Chris Kaba presented a sufficient danger to justify being shot.' This assertion highlights the contentious nature of police use-of-force decisions.
Naseem emphasized, 'A police officer can only use lethal force when it's absolutely necessary. At the point the weapon was fired, that did not appear to be the case.' This critique underscores the need for stricter accountability in police operations.
The case reflects systemic issues, as noted by the Metropolitan Police regarding the need for reform in how officers are held accountable for their use of force.
The former police firearms officer expressed a belief that Chris Kaba would have survived the encounter but for Sgt Blake's unexpected intervention, raising questions about decision-making under pressure.
Collection
[
|
...
]