The article emphasizes the critical need for nonprofits to engage more actively in civic and election-related activities to strengthen their political power and drive meaningful social change. Despite significant growth in the sector, nonprofits often remain passive, limited by their 501c3 status which prohibits candidate endorsements. Yet, they can still participate in various activities, such as lobbying, voter education, and organizing forums. The article highlights organizations like the Alliance for Justice's Bolder Advocacy program as examples of effective engagement, while referencing historical critiques of nonprofits that urge for greater advocacy to influence progressive policies.
Despite being a significant economic force, nonprofits maintain a weak position in political advocacy, limiting their potential for meaningful social change, particularly as we approach the 2024 election.
While 501c3 organizations are restricted from endorsing political candidates, many possibilities exist for nonprofits to engage in election-related activities, such as voter registration and issue forums.
Historically, critiques of the nonprofit sector, like Robert O. Bothwell's 2001 paper, emphasize the need for increased advocacy to combat the decline of progressive policy.
Organizations like the Alliance for Justice's Bolder Advocacy program and Nonprofit VOTE exemplify models through which nonprofits can effectively leverage their resources for civic engagement.
Collection
[
|
...
]