The article discusses the alarming use of presidential power to intimidate Biglaw firms, impacting the legal system's integrity. It highlights how many firms are capitulating to avoid retribution from Trump while looking for his approval by offering legal services to conservative causes. To monitor this, the article introduces the Biglaw Spine Index, which will track firms in the Am Law 200 based on their responses to these challenges, revealing a complex landscape of compliance and resistance within the legal community.
The President's actions against Biglaw firms are chilling and attack the fundamental rule of law, which is essential to restraining abuses of power.
Many firms seek Trump's approval by providing pro bono legal services for conservative causes to avoid retaliation, highlighting their willingness to compromise.
The Biglaw Spine Index tracks how Am Law 200 firms respond to Trump's attacks, revealing a divide between those who capitulate and those who resist.
This evolving situation shows that more firms may either submit to pressure or assert their independence, affecting the landscape of legal representation.
Collection
[
|
...
]