Biometrics vs. passcodes: What lawyers say if you're worried about warrantless phone searches
Briefly

The article discusses the rise in smartphone searches by US law enforcement, particularly amidst escalated ICE detentions. It highlights concerns about privacy and the implications of such searches, as illustrated by civil rights attorney Amir Makled's experience at Detroit Metro Airport. Makled's questioning about his clients and the demand for his cellphone underscore the potential for misuse of personal data. Additionally, a graphic circulating online cautions against biometric unlocks on phones, suggesting that passcodes better protect user privacy, as they require a search warrant for access.
US authorities allegedly dig through past emails, photos, social network activity, and other content to establish grounds for apprehension or other enforcement decisions.
Concern is rising that more people could be held accountable for their beliefs, acquaintances, work, or speech, amidst reports of smartphone searches.
Makled, who was questioned about his clients at the airport, emphasizes the alarming nature of such searches, especially for American citizens.
A graphic shared on social media warns smartphone users that biometric unlocks can be compelled without a warrant, unlike passcodes.
Read at ZDNET
[
|
]