Dr. Diana Warner's suspension reflects a deeper conflict between civil resistance for climate action and the upholding of professional medical integrity as defined by the GMC.
The tribunal accepted there were no concerns about Dr. Warner's clinical practice, yet condemned her actions in protests, suggesting they could undermine patient trust.
Warner's case illustrates growing tensions as doctors involved in climate protests face disciplinary action, raising ethical questions about activism within the medical profession.
With doctors like Sarah Benn appealing their suspensions, the relationship between medical practice and activism is increasingly under scrutiny, highlighting potential professional repercussions.
Collection
[
|
...
]