The FTC's recent RFI on "Technology Platform Censorship" examines the intersection of antitrust concerns and content moderation. However, it misinterprets the role of antitrust enforcement by failing to recognize that current competitive markets allow for diverse content moderation strategies and protections like Section 230 enhance competition. Instead of indicating monopolistic practices, varied content moderation approaches demonstrate how users can easily switch platforms based on their preferences, suggesting that concerns regarding content moderation should not invoke antitrust action or intervention in otherwise healthy competition.
Antitrust enforcement and competition policy, while powerful, should not be applied to concerns about content moderation as it misunderstands the market's dynamics.
Section 230's current liability protections actually foster competition among platforms, enabling varied content moderation policies that cater to distinct user preferences.
Different social media platforms provide unique content moderation strategies. Users often gravitate towards sites aligning with their values and moderation expectations.
The evolution of content moderation illustrates how users respond to changes, highlighting the competitive nature of the market rather than indicating monopolistic issues.
Collection
[
|
...
]