I stopped explaining myself when I apologize and the reactions taught me exactly which people in my life had been treating my explanations as retractions. To them, sorry with a reason attached meant sorry didn't really count, and sorry without one meant I was finally admitting fault on their terms. - Silicon Canals
Briefly

I stopped explaining myself when I apologize and the reactions taught me exactly which people in my life had been treating my explanations as retractions. To them, sorry with a reason attached meant sorry didn't really count, and sorry without one meant I was finally admitting fault on their terms. - Silicon Canals
"Most people believe that a good apology comes with an explanation. The thinking goes: if you can show you understand why something happened, the person you've hurt will feel heard, and you'll both move forward with a clearer picture."
"When I started offering apologies without explanations, three distinct reactions emerged. The first group barely noticed the change. These were people who had always been listening for the accountability itself."
"The second group felt uncomfortable on my behalf. They'd ask what happened or check if I was okay. They wanted the context not because they needed it to believe my apology, but because they cared about me."
"The third group was satisfied in a way they'd never been before. This was the telling one."
Many believe a good apology requires an explanation to be effective. However, some individuals perceive explanations as loopholes rather than context. An experiment revealed three reactions to apologies without explanations. The first group valued accountability and connection, the second group cared personally, and the third group felt satisfied in a new way. This experiment highlighted the importance of understanding how different people respond to apologies and the dynamics of relationships.
Read at Silicon Canals
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]