RFK Jr.'s New Report Actually Nails What's Wrong With American Health. Too Bad About the Other Part.
Briefly

The article contrasts the experiences of two children, Emma in France and Madison in Ohio, highlighting how French government policies promote better health outcomes through regulated food quality, controlled advertising to children, and a safer environment. While Emma benefits from nutritional lunches and a balanced media consumption, Madison faces unhealthy food marketing, access to junk food, and a harmful digital landscape. These differences are evident in the children's health rankings: France ranks third in child well-being, compared to the U.S.'s 36th position. The author, a pediatrician, emphasizes the need for policy changes in the U.S. to address chronic diseases caused by poor nutrition, environmental toxins, and social media influence.
The difference in health outcomes between French and American children stems not from medicine, but from the government's approach to food, environment, and digital content.
French regulations prioritize healthy eating and environmental safety, leading to better outcomes for children compared to the U.S., where unregulated practices contribute to chronic diseases.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]