In the latest motion, defendants argue that the plaintiff, Eytalis, fails to establish a viable claim regarding antitrust violations or contracts concerning MLS access. They assert her intention is primarily to bypass membership dues. Although Eytalis alleges that the defendants' policies are monopolistic, the defendants state that local association WFAR has the discretion to require membership for MLS access. The defendants contend that the claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment lack factual support, contending that no breach occurred since NAR and TR are not parties to the WFAR bylaws.
Eytalis describes her suit as a fundamental challenge to the monopolistic and exclusionary practices of Defendants, which have resulted in systemic harm to independent real estate brokers.
The defendants argue that it is up to WFAR alone to determine if it wants to require Realtor membership in order for a licensee to gain access to the association's MLS.
Collection
[
|
...
]