
A retiree with a $1.2 million portfolio fully invested in S&P 500 index funds experiences a roughly 16% drawdown over three weeks, creating a paper loss of about $187,000. With a 4% withdrawal plan, the retiree draws about $48,000 per year to cover expenses. The key risk is sequence-of-returns risk, where the timing of poor returns during early retirement can lower lifetime income even if long-term average returns are similar. A 15% drawdown in the first year can reduce the safe withdrawal rate by about 25% over 30 years. Selling shares at market lows to fund spending removes those shares from future compounding. A bucket strategy can reduce the need to sell equities during drawdowns by separating assets by time horizon.
"This scenario plays out regularly on Reddit's r/retirement forums. Someone who held equities through accumulation, kept the allocation into retirement, and discovers that the volatility they tolerated at 45 feels different at 67. A 15% to 16% peak-to-trough move is unremarkable in market history."
"Research from Wade Pfau and Michael Kitces shows that a 15% drawdown in year one of retirement can cut the safe withdrawal rate by roughly 25% over a 30-year horizon. Shares sold at the bottom to fund the mortgage and the grocery bill never recover when the market rebounds."
"The math is unforgiving. Pulling $4,000 a month from a portfolio down 15% means liquidating more shares to raise the same dollars. Each of those shares is gone permanently from the compounding base. The S&P 500 will likely recover, but the shares sold at the lows do not participate."
"The fix is building a structure where the next drawdown does not force selling. For most retirees with $1 million to $2 million, the right answer is some version of the bucket strategy."
#sequence-of-returns-risk #retirement-withdrawals #sp-500-index-funds #safe-withdrawal-rate #bucket-strategy
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]