Rubio's Dilemma: Cutting Trump's Deal With Bloodthirsty' Putin
Briefly

The article recounts a critical Senate hearing where Senator Marco Rubio challenged Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson on Vladimir Putin's war crimes. Despite the clear consensus on Putin's violent actions, Tillerson avoided the question, reflecting the Trump administration's conflicted stance on Russia. Rubio criticized this lack of moral clarity necessary for the Secretary of State's role, especially in light of recent global events like Russia's invasion of Ukraine, prompting him to advocate for unwavering support for Ukraine against Russian aggression.
At his 2017 confirmation hearing, Marco Rubio pressed Rex Tillerson on whether Vladimir Putin is a war criminal, highlighting the awkward position Tillerson was placed in due to Trump's admiration for Putin.
Rubio expressed frustration at Tillerson's evasion, emphasizing the importance of moral clarity in the role of Secretary of State, especially regarding global influence and the actions of authoritarian leaders.
With the onset of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, Rubio pushed the Biden administration to commit to supporting Ukraine as long as they continue fighting against Russian aggression.
The hearing underscored the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations under the Trump administration, contrasting Rubio's call for accountability with Tillerson's cautious stance amid ongoing international turmoil.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]