The article discusses the renewed efforts of FASORP against law reviews, specifically targeting Michigan Law. FASORP's controversial strategy involves sending threatening emails to students, accusing law reviews of unconstitutional racial preferencing and indicating that they will leak personal information of those they deem unworthy. This reflects a broader national debate following recent rulings on affirmative action and recruitment strategies in academic spaces. The article suggests that these attacks aim to undermine diversity initiatives by creating fear among prospective law students about their validity and merit.
Doubtless there are some 1Ls who have been intending to trumpet their demographic characteristics in the 'personal statements' that they submit to the Law Review, in the hopes of obtaining a diversity bonus and stealing a place on the journal from a more deserving student with better grades and better scores on the writing competition.
FASORP will subpoena every personal statement in discovery, and if we uncover evidence that you obtained your spot on the Law Review through race or sex preferences then you be exposed as a DEI hire on social media.
Collection
[
|
...
]